![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhzE237Lelw-9t5FPW3jahyphenhyphenzPIfmusvqy9MxrOya7uoZK-vju-JS2zQa94VnHhSABhfuC72NOh39D-iMBYO3T_MNqTM1nqEpptku-ER5CayY_qTBhfOw_EZT78x-0VLzoMh9-Jduwr8Yas/s200/superiodonutscover.jpg)
Like AOC, the dialogue was quick, witty and full of some great one-liners (as one character is left dumb-founded for an answer, another retorts “you’re like George Bush on Jeopardy”). But unlike the brilliant dinner table blow-out in AOC, the final conflict - the fight between Arthur and Luther - was so badly choreographed it was almost laughable. Both actors seemed incredibly awkward and every punch and kick moved just a hair too slow to be believable. They either need to scrap the fight entirely or re-choreograph.
As far as the play, it’s solid. Although some of the peripheral characters border on clichĂ© (the loud Russian immigrant, the rough-around-the-edges Irish lady cop, the crazy old alcoholic lady, etc.). But they’re all extremely likeable in a “Cheers” sort of way. The cast is solid to outstanding, especially Jon Michael Hill as the aspiring black writer. His relationship with the middle-aged hippie, Arthur, produces the play’s best verbal repartee.
I question the directorial choice of leaving the stage slightly lit during Arthur’s monologues. Intellectually, I understand what the director seems to be doing, but seeing the other actors move furniture while a main character is imparting important information seems defeatist.
No comments:
Post a Comment