Annie
Palace Theatre
Friday, Feb 8, 8pm performance
After years obsessing over this show's thrilling overture on the original Broadway
cast recording - sadly cut to shreds in the current revival - I finally
got a chance to see my first, live stage performance of Annie.
Thanks to Storm Nemo, Trish, me and visiting friend, Dylan, scored ninth row
center orchestra seats via the half-price TKTS booth. Given the storm, it was no surprise the curtain went up nearly 15 minutes late. The real surprise came at 8:00 PM when we turned
to survey the nearly half-empty theatre.
I had a flashback to the 2004 Broadway production of Dracula,
The Musical. At that yawn-inducing performance, I shared the entire balcony with just one other
pathetic show queen, my legs draped over the seatback in front of me, half dozing and
waiting for Kelli O’Hara’s nude scene.
Sadly, nothing as exciting as Kelli’s bare breasts is on display at the
Palace.
In the title role, spunky Lilla Crawford possesses a freakishly high and unusually pleasant belt. And yes, I got nostalgically misty-eyed when she
reached the penultimate refrain of “Tomorrow,” but it was tough to get past some
of her rather - how shall I put it? - "extreme" acting choices. I know
it’s a dick move to pick on an 11-year-old, but hell, she’s got two more
Broadway credits than I do, so she’ll need to suck it up.
In fairness, James Lapine should probably carry the burden of guilt for
many of these questionable choices (i.e. Annie literally having a full-on screaming fit when Warbucks tries to take her pendant). From the very opening scene, moodily lit and draped in fake stage smoke, to the entrance of the super-scary, seemingly Gestapo-trained Hannigan (Katie Finneran), it’s obvious the artistic team was going for a darker, more
“real” Annie. But I’m not sure the orphanage scenes should read like DVD extras off of "Schindler's List."
To her credit, Finneran balances this darkness with the same quirky sense of humor that made her a
stand-out (and Tony winner!) in the 2010 Broadway revival of Promises, Promises. But at the performance I attended, her
usually perfect comic timing seemed a bit off - perhaps a combination of the
late start and storm - though she seemed to find her groove again about midway
through the first act.
The choreography by In The Heights alum Andy
Blankenbuehler had not a whiff of period authenticity, but was always
interesting if at times bizarrely modern.
His only true miss was the unfortunate closing tap number. There’s something definitely amiss when your
dancing ensemble of Broadway vets looks like it was plucked from a community theatre production
of Dames At Sea.
The physical production was also a series of hits and misses. The opening tableau, the orphanage and
Warbucks’ mansion felt appropriately full and sumptuous, but the entire NYC
montage took place on a mainly bare stage with only a few cheesy digital effects
projected onto the sprawling, back scrim.
The small adult ensemble sounded gorgeous, but their numbers could barely fill the
huge Palace stage in the large ensemble scenes. No amount of costume changes could cover the fact that the same six exhausted cast members kept running back on stage.
The orphans are all appropriately cute and obviously talented, but even with the
Benetton-ad diversity, they are for the most part, indistinguishable (again, I
blame the direction).
Rooster and Lily are appropriately bumbling, finding the right combination
of comic silliness to balance this productions penchant for gritty realism. J. Elaine Marcos successfully straddles the
line of political correctness, imbuing Lily with the clueless naivete of Long Duk Dong in Sixteen Candles while sounding like a surly Chinese take-out waitress.
Anthony Warlow is the perfect Warbucks, handsome and possessing a gorgeous ringing, legit
baritone voice. The theatre queen in me is practically squealing at the thought of his Ben Stone or Guido Contini.
Brynn O’Malley is adequately prim and proper as Grace, but is also oddly cold and
aloof. One wonders why Warbucks is even attracted
to her. And why does she have a British
accent?
The current revival is slick, well-produced, with several very good - and a
couple of great - moments, but ultimately didn’t satisfy as a theatrical whole.
On a side note, while waiting for the subway at 49th Street and discussing the show, some random guy jumped into our conversation, having obviously been eavesdropping from nearby. Not creepy at all. Of course, if he had looked like Ryan Gosling rather than Newman from Seinfeld, I'd probably not have minded so much. And yes, I totally admit how superficial that seems, but I guess that's why Ted Bundy was so successful.
Sunday, February 10, 2013
Annie
Saturday, February 9, 2013
Blizzard, shmizzard…bring on the orphans! And tales of Times Square and mom jeans.
With Storm Nemo threatening to close down the city, Trish and I decided to
throw caution to the wind and ignore Mayor Bloomberg’s warning to “stay off the
city streets.” Instead, we treated visiting Summer Conservatory staff
member, Dylan Shelofsky, to a day in the gray-brown slush of a NYC snowstorm.
As a native Coloradan, we figured a couple feet of snow would barely impress,
let alone hamper, Dylan’s mobility during her weekend trip to the Big Apple.
My Times Square office, on the other hand, was in full panic mode and dismissed us early. Trish and I took advantage of my free afternoon and the uncharacteristic empty sidewalks to explore midtown with our visiting protégé. Since Dylan is way too cool to have visited any of the usual Times Square tourist traps on previous trips, we decided to take advantage of the storm-thinned crowds to go full frontal tourist!
First stop? The Hershey Store, of course. Where else can you buy the same candy bar your local drug store carries and sells at half the price?! At least they give out free samples. Next, we headed across the street to M&M’s World where they somehow manage to fill three retail floors with M&M’s merchandise. Did you know there’s an M&M military jeep dispenser? Who knew? Who buys?
With the snow piling up to nearly a whopping eighth of an inch, we bravely
made our way to the TKTS booth. All real New Yorkers know that the best
time to get great seats for a Broadway show is during a snowstorm (or a Jewish
holiday). Since none of us had ever seen a professional mounting of Annie, we
decided to fork over our cash to see that plucky red head just stick out her
chin and grin and say…everyone sing!
We still had a couple of hours to kill before show time. So our next stop was Toys R’ Us Times Square. Now, I’m usually a cynic when it comes to the Times Square big box retail stores, but Toys R’ Us is definitely worth a stop if only for it’s full-sized ferris wheel and Barbie castle.
Usually, tickets to ride the ferris wheel are sold out by mid-day, but thanks to Storm Nemo’s threatening conditions, the store was practically empty and we were able to jump right on. Sadly, Barbie’s castle was undergoing some renovation. But even under construction, we were able to laugh and make disparaging comments about the Pink Label Edward and Bella Barbies on display. I’m sure Kristen Stewart is lying at home wiping away tears of hurt with hundred dollar bills even as we speak.
Finally, we headed to my favorite Times Square
retailer, Forever 21. Yes, you read that
correctly, Forever 21. I know many of you
look to me as a barometer of teen fashion, so I hesitantly give away my fashion
secret weapon. Given the day’s busy
tourist schedule, however, I was in no mood to sift through racks of skinny-legged
jeans. And yes, I do see the irony of me
considering purchasing “skinny” jeans given my healthy 38” waist, but style
trumps function, says I. (For those of
you new to my blog or unaware of my “unique” sense of humor, that entire last
paragraph was meant to be sarcastic. It
was only a few years ago that Trish had to pry my favorite pair of high-waisted
mom jeans from my death grip.)
After a needed injection of Chai tea and a slice of chocolate banana bread from Starbucks - incidentally, one of the few stores still open in the wake of the “blizzard” - we headed to the Palace theatre hoping a gaggle of depression-era orphans might cheer us up on this cold, snowy evening.
Viewing the half empty theatre from our ninth row orchestra seats, it was obvious most citizens heeded Bloomberg’s advice. But other than a late start, the show proceeded with a full cast (no understudies!). As the old adage goes - the show must go on - even without an audience. You can read my review here.
My Times Square office, on the other hand, was in full panic mode and dismissed us early. Trish and I took advantage of my free afternoon and the uncharacteristic empty sidewalks to explore midtown with our visiting protégé. Since Dylan is way too cool to have visited any of the usual Times Square tourist traps on previous trips, we decided to take advantage of the storm-thinned crowds to go full frontal tourist!
First stop? The Hershey Store, of course. Where else can you buy the same candy bar your local drug store carries and sells at half the price?! At least they give out free samples. Next, we headed across the street to M&M’s World where they somehow manage to fill three retail floors with M&M’s merchandise. Did you know there’s an M&M military jeep dispenser? Who knew? Who buys?
| Dylan and Trish enjoying the Ferris wheel. |
We still had a couple of hours to kill before show time. So our next stop was Toys R’ Us Times Square. Now, I’m usually a cynic when it comes to the Times Square big box retail stores, but Toys R’ Us is definitely worth a stop if only for it’s full-sized ferris wheel and Barbie castle.
Usually, tickets to ride the ferris wheel are sold out by mid-day, but thanks to Storm Nemo’s threatening conditions, the store was practically empty and we were able to jump right on. Sadly, Barbie’s castle was undergoing some renovation. But even under construction, we were able to laugh and make disparaging comments about the Pink Label Edward and Bella Barbies on display. I’m sure Kristen Stewart is lying at home wiping away tears of hurt with hundred dollar bills even as we speak.
![]() |
| An example of my indelible fashion sense. |
After a needed injection of Chai tea and a slice of chocolate banana bread from Starbucks - incidentally, one of the few stores still open in the wake of the “blizzard” - we headed to the Palace theatre hoping a gaggle of depression-era orphans might cheer us up on this cold, snowy evening.
Viewing the half empty theatre from our ninth row orchestra seats, it was obvious most citizens heeded Bloomberg’s advice. But other than a late start, the show proceeded with a full cast (no understudies!). As the old adage goes - the show must go on - even without an audience. You can read my review here.
Friday, February 8, 2013
Nice Work If You Can Get It or Crazy-For-You Lite
Nice Work If You Can Get It
Imperial Theatre
Thursday, Feb 7, 7pm
Seriously, can we please set-up a statute of limitation for the use of “Someone To Watch Over Me” in a Broadway show? At least another 50 years, please? Sure, it’s a classic, but the Gershwins did write other love songs, ya’ know.
Sorry, rant over. Anyway – why “Crazy-For-You” Lite? Well, unlike Crazy For You, this little Gershwin bauble isn’t based on an existing Gershwin show, but created from scratch by looting the Gershwin catalogue and throwing together what is supposed to be a capricious tale of a millionaire playboy and a tomboy bootlegger. It’s apparently “based on material” by Guy Bolton and P.G.Wodehouse, whatever that means, since it was nominated for Best NEW Musical at the 2012 Tony Awards.
It’s also not quite as funny, the book writing isn’t nearly as tight, the songs aren’t integrated quite as well and the production numbers aren’t nearly as clever or exciting as its predecessor.
So I hated it, right? Well, not exactly. How can you hate a Gershwin score or the delightful (if miscast) Kelli O’Hara?
Director/choreographer Kathleen Marshall doesn’t quite provide the needed pace and manic energy a musical farce requires. And a 1920s musical without a single tap number? Sacrilege!
Some of the blame can also be thrown at book writer Joe DiPietro, who does provide some solid laughs, but whose many one-liners are hit-and-miss.
I loves me some Kelli O’Hara, but she’s not quite tomboyish enough for my taste, though her singing is sublime (as usual). She also shows a knack for whacky physical comedy in her hilarious take on “Treat Me Rough.” Who knew?
Ferris Bueller…er, I mean, Matthew Broderick, is appealing, if a bit too stoic as playboy, Jimmy. His intentionally underplayed characterization is an interesting choice, but one wonders why so many gals have fallen under the spell of this schlumpy, personality-free mama’s boy.
Standouts for me were the secondary couple, Robyn Hurder and Chris Sullivan (Jeannie and Duke). Her ditzy blonde and his loveable goofball have the only real onstage chemistry.
Judy Kaye and Blythe Danner are fun, but wasted in small supporting roles. And the costumer should be sentenced to community service at Easy Pickins for putting Ms. Danner in that unflattering black flapper dress.
If Ms. Marshall had choreographed the entire show with the same sense of frothy fun she found staging “Delishious” (spoiler alert: the ensemble spilling clown-car-like from the tiny bathtub), the show might have risen above the limitations of the book.
Oh well, just bring on a revival of Crazy For You!
Imperial Theatre
Thursday, Feb 7, 7pm
Seriously, can we please set-up a statute of limitation for the use of “Someone To Watch Over Me” in a Broadway show? At least another 50 years, please? Sure, it’s a classic, but the Gershwins did write other love songs, ya’ know.
Sorry, rant over. Anyway – why “Crazy-For-You” Lite? Well, unlike Crazy For You, this little Gershwin bauble isn’t based on an existing Gershwin show, but created from scratch by looting the Gershwin catalogue and throwing together what is supposed to be a capricious tale of a millionaire playboy and a tomboy bootlegger. It’s apparently “based on material” by Guy Bolton and P.G.Wodehouse, whatever that means, since it was nominated for Best NEW Musical at the 2012 Tony Awards.
It’s also not quite as funny, the book writing isn’t nearly as tight, the songs aren’t integrated quite as well and the production numbers aren’t nearly as clever or exciting as its predecessor.
So I hated it, right? Well, not exactly. How can you hate a Gershwin score or the delightful (if miscast) Kelli O’Hara?
Director/choreographer Kathleen Marshall doesn’t quite provide the needed pace and manic energy a musical farce requires. And a 1920s musical without a single tap number? Sacrilege!
Some of the blame can also be thrown at book writer Joe DiPietro, who does provide some solid laughs, but whose many one-liners are hit-and-miss.
I loves me some Kelli O’Hara, but she’s not quite tomboyish enough for my taste, though her singing is sublime (as usual). She also shows a knack for whacky physical comedy in her hilarious take on “Treat Me Rough.” Who knew?
Ferris Bueller…er, I mean, Matthew Broderick, is appealing, if a bit too stoic as playboy, Jimmy. His intentionally underplayed characterization is an interesting choice, but one wonders why so many gals have fallen under the spell of this schlumpy, personality-free mama’s boy.
Standouts for me were the secondary couple, Robyn Hurder and Chris Sullivan (Jeannie and Duke). Her ditzy blonde and his loveable goofball have the only real onstage chemistry.
Judy Kaye and Blythe Danner are fun, but wasted in small supporting roles. And the costumer should be sentenced to community service at Easy Pickins for putting Ms. Danner in that unflattering black flapper dress.
If Ms. Marshall had choreographed the entire show with the same sense of frothy fun she found staging “Delishious” (spoiler alert: the ensemble spilling clown-car-like from the tiny bathtub), the show might have risen above the limitations of the book.
Oh well, just bring on a revival of Crazy For You!
Monday, February 4, 2013
Beyonce’s Warm-up Act OR Super Bowl XLVII: A Gay Man’s Perspective
| Our fancy Scoops ice cream cake. |
In true Pineda style, upon arrival we headed straight to the
kitchen. Sure, the TV was on in the
living room, but the real action was happening in the kitchen.
Val was at the stove frying up pierogies, Juan was at the fry daddy
tending to the wings and Juan’s white son, Chris Grimm, was implementing some “quality
control” at the hors d’oeuvre tray. I’d spent the morning preparing a 2-pound tray
of bacon mac and cheese, so I immediately usurped the oven to re-heat my lactosean
nightmare - that’s right, 4 cups of heavy cream and 2 kinds of cheese, bitches!
Eventually we settled into the living room for the start of the show - er, um - game. First off, what's up with the Ravens’ costumes? Um, I mean uniforms. Who picked that shade of purple? Just terrible. They could have at least gone with a nice aubergine or grape for better contrast with the Astroturf. Perhaps, in a good will gesture the 49ers can forward the Ravens the name of their stylist. I mean, the 49ers are from San Francisco, right? Of course their outfits are fierce.
Eventually we settled into the living room for the start of the show - er, um - game. First off, what's up with the Ravens’ costumes? Um, I mean uniforms. Who picked that shade of purple? Just terrible. They could have at least gone with a nice aubergine or grape for better contrast with the Astroturf. Perhaps, in a good will gesture the 49ers can forward the Ravens the name of their stylist. I mean, the 49ers are from San Francisco, right? Of course their outfits are fierce.
Speaking of outfits - who talked you into wearing that S&M turtleneck, Ms. Hudson? Yes,
you have a bangin’ new bod thanks to Weight Watchers, but that top is a little too “50
Shades of Grey” for my taste. I hope you used a lot of baby powder because
that’s gonna’ chafe. Not that I would know. Oh well, you still
sounded amazing. And nice touch with the
back-up chorus of step-touching elementary school children. Although
the white and khaki outfits need to go.
It was like watching a convention of midget car salesmen.
Ms. Keys fared much better than Ms. Hudson in the wardrobe department,
but her muzak version of the National Anthem was a real snoozer. Here’s a helpful tip - if you need to take a
breath every two words, either you’re tempo is too slow or you’re in desperate need of
better vocal technique (or both?). And it is
absolutely never appropriate to riff for thirty seconds AFTER you’ve sung the
last word of the National Anthem. Self-indulgent
much?
I’m not exactly sure what occurred between the coin
toss and Beyoncé half-time extravaganza, but there seemed to be a lot of running, pushing and shoving. Oh, and a lot of slow motion. For athletes, there sure was a lot of awkward
jiggling in those tight outfits. Note to
self, slow motion and spandex - not a good look. My main concern during the first act
- er, um…inning - no, wait - um…oh, I give up - was that my seven-layer dip was
missing it's crucial sixth layer. Since avocados are out of season I had to - gasp - skip the guacamole. Oddly, no one seemed to notice.
And then there was (insert angelic “Ah” here) Beyoncé. To paraphrase Brian Hart’s facebook status (a
former Pineda Conservatory student), “That’s what heaven’s like.” Preach. And can we talk about her “sex face”? Don't even get me started on her luscious weave.
Post half-time was sort of a blur to me, I think someone forgot to pay the electric bill or something. To be honest, I couldn’t concentrate on the TV because Val was piling more food and dessert on the table. I mean, ice cream cake crunchies or Super Bowl? There's really no contest.
Since I usually root for the team with the cutest quarterback, this year left me with a particularly difficult quandary - Italian-American hunk or young tattoo-ed hottie? In the end, it didn't really matter. I got my caloric intake for the year and one team won a really big, tacky ring.
I won't even comment on the all the lame commercials this year except to say I threw up in my mouth a little watching that hot model make out with the frizzy-haired nerd. Isn't it totally possible to be both hot and smart? Of course it is. I'm looking in the mirror right now at a prime example. Call me, GoDaddy.
Trish and I are already planning on making millions by renting out our bedrooms next year when New York hosts the next Super Bowl.
Congratulations, Ravens!
Congratulations, Ravens!
Labels:
bad singing,
family,
football,
friends,
gay gay gay,
photos,
superbowl
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Golden Age
Golden Age
City Center Stage 1
Saturday, January 12, 2pm
I’m trying to catch up on some missed reviews, so although
it’s been weeks since Trish and I saw Golden Age, I’ll try to wring my
aging brain for recollections.
First off, thank you TDF for a lovely set of third-row,
center orchestra seats! All the better
to view Lee Pace in all his dreamy glory.
The opera purists and fact-checkers in the audience will likely take issue with Terrance McNally’s fast and loose interpretation
of history (not to mention the musical and verbal anachronisms). But no matter, this is a comedy about the
creation of art, not a historical drama, and McNally creates a believable
backstage microcosm where the plentiful use of modern four-letter profanity
doesn’t seem out of place.
Lee Pace - did I mention how dreamy he is? - has the charm and charisma to make the egocentric Bellini a likeable, even sympathetic, figure. He’s a man that is never satisfied musically (or sexually, for that matter). Pace plays these proclivities with a refreshing matter-of-factness.
Lee Pace - did I mention how dreamy he is? - has the charm and charisma to make the egocentric Bellini a likeable, even sympathetic, figure. He’s a man that is never satisfied musically (or sexually, for that matter). Pace plays these proclivities with a refreshing matter-of-factness.
Bebe Neuwirth, as the diva Maria Malibran, is the only
character in the play that is completely aware of her incredible talent as well
as shortcomings. She accepts and
acknowledges the decline of her voice, yet is the only artist lacking in
self-doubt.
Malibran’s appearance - in flaming red gown, natch - may
not be the most subtle symbol, but opera queens will recognize the comparison McNally offers. What is most preferable, a perfect technique lacking in emotional
depth or a flawed instrument connected to a vibrant emotional core? Po-tay-to, Pa-tah-to - though from my interpretation, it seems McNally endorses the latter.
Though at times the
script reads like a high-concept
sitcom, McNally plays with the inherent insecurities of performers and artists, while scrutinizing the audience's ideas about art and the creation of art.
It's an enjoyable afternoon with an eccentric group of characters, but I wish McNally had either pushed the comedy further into true farce territory, or gone a much darker route with the psychological breakdown of Bellini and/or the dueling sopranos.
Monday, January 7, 2013
Shakin’ his Broadway Bon Bon - Ricky Martin in Evita
Evita
Marriott Marquis Theatre
Saturday, Jan 5, 8pm
![]() |
| Menudo! Gotta' love the 80s! |
I don’t know what voodoo witchcraft he prescribes to, but that
Ricky just gets better looking with age.
I mean, he’s so glaringly attractive that you almost don’t notice he can’t
act. Perhaps I’m just a bit critical,
having played the role myself years ago with staging based on the original, brilliant
Hal Prince concept.
Ricky looks and sounds wonderful, has charisma to spare and
his accent adds some extra sex appeal, but he’s basically just being Ricky
Martin. I didn’t sense he had a strong connection
to the story or that his character had a discernable point of view. He also loses points for his generic “robot
arm” acting gestures. But since he’s so
dreamy, I’ll give Ricky the benefit of the doubt and blame the director for any
shortcomings. I mean, if you cast a pop
star with limited acting chops, you’d better direct the hell out of him or have
him shirtless throughout. Am I right,
ladies?
Of course, the Latin-heavy tourist crowd (the opening cell
phone announcement was made in both English and Spanish) could have cared less about
silly details like acting. And given the
very loud chatter throughout the show (in Spanish, btw, so I’m not just making
broad racist assumptions), most of the crowd didn’t even realize they were in a
Broadway theatre and not casually lounging in their living rooms. The gentleman next to me was literally
chanting “Peron” along with the cast. I
kid you not.
Many in the theatre chat rooms have complained about Elena
Roger’s vocal deficiencies. Granted, hers
is perhaps the ugliest, shrillest voice in the history of Broadway leading
ladies - and that’s being generous.
Despite that, by the middle of the first act I had warmed to - or at
least gotten used to - her odd vocal quality and actually quite enjoyed her
performance. Let’s face it, the show is
basically a check-list of historical events with little character development inherent
in the script and score. And still,
Roger’s manages to provide a thrilling, three dimensional performance without belting
any high notes -- though they are sorely missed. Her Eva is strong yet sympathetic, making her
act two decline particularly moving.
Like Roger, Michael Cerveris elevates his material well
beyond what on paper is a very sketchy characterization. Though I must admit, to my ears his basso profundo always seems faked and artificial. It doesn’t have the true bass-baritone ring
of a George Hearn or James Barbour. I
guess you could say the artificiality adds to his characterization of a manipulative
politician. Or you could say he’s just
faking it.
Even though I take swipes at the script and score, Evita
is actually my favorite Andrew Lloyd Webber show. It’s concise, driving and contains some of
his best melodies. When performed well,
the show is visceral and exciting to watch.
But because the characters aren’t intrinsically sympathetic, it takes a great
director/choreographer to make the show work.
If you don’t know the original Hal Prince staging or are
only reading this review to find out if they’ve added a Che nude scene (no such
luck, folks), then you can probably stop reading now.
In no particular order, these are my specific observations
of the staging and production values given my familiarity with the material and
original staging (warning: spoilers ahead and probably really boring if you’re
not an Evita-phile).
- For the most part, I liked the tango inflected choreography, especially in the opening “…Circus” and “Buenos Aires.”
- Tempos, especially in the first 30 minutes of the show are deathly slow and kill any momentum inherent in the rock and Latin rhythms of the score.
- The set is gorgeous, but clunky.
- Cutting the opening scene in the movie theatre is a mistake. The scene gives the audience a frame of reference as to how much the common Argentine folks loved Eva Peron.
- The original musical chairs concept for “Art of the Possible” makes much more sense than the weird, tango fight staging in the current production. The point of the scene is that Peron’s ascent to power is random, like winning a game of musical chairs. The staged fighting doesn’t nearly convey this point as clearly.
- In the original staging of “Waltz for Eva and Che,” the two dance but never touch. To me, this is a much stronger choice since it emphasizes Che’s role as an observer, not participant. It also visually symbolizes Eva’s wish to separate herself from her humble beginnings.
- The ensemble choral singing is superb.
Neutered “Cat…” and Benjamin Walker's lucky towel
Richard Rodgers Theatre
Saturday, Jan 5, 2pm performance
I didn’t think it was possible, but somehow the director of the latest Broadway revival of Cat On a Hot Tin Roof managed to reduce the oozing-with-sex Scarlett Johansson into a nagging, “Real Housewife of Atlanta.”
Saturday, Jan 5, 2pm performance
I didn’t think it was possible, but somehow the director of the latest Broadway revival of Cat On a Hot Tin Roof managed to reduce the oozing-with-sex Scarlett Johansson into a nagging, “Real Housewife of Atlanta.”
I’m actually a ScarJo fan and Maggie seems like a perfect
fit, but her performance here is…what’s the word? -- Brash? Un-nuanced?
I mean, even with those big pouty lips and booty, other than her accent,
there’s nothing remotely sexy or “Southern” about her characterization. In fact (spoiler alert), if Brick is gay, he
might actually be turned on by this steam-rolling Maggie.
Anyway, I think the play works better when Maggie uses her
sexuality to manipulate her circumstances.
It makes her character more interesting.
And really, the play is called Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, not Badger
on a Hot Tin Roof or Rabid Cat on a Hot Tin Roof. As it stands, you wonder why Brick married
her at all. She seems like sort of a
bitch.
Oh, to be Benjamin Walker’s towel. It's amusing watching
him try and nonchalantly “tuck” it around his privates anytime he sits down. He seemed a bit under-energized
in the first act but he grew
on me as the play progressed. It was a matinee, so I’ll throw him some slack. Did I
mention he looks good in a towel?
The director, Rob Ashford, is - surprise - gay! No kidding - a de-sexualized Maggie, a
shirtless Brick and an added “ghost of Skipper” character who Brick longingly
stares at throughout the play. It’s
called “subtext” for a reason, folks. Instead,
we’re bludgeoned in the face with a pink sledgehammer.
For me, Ciaran Hinds and Debra Monk (Big Daddy and Big Mama,
respectively) fare best in this revival, though Monk tends to lose her accent
when she gets emotional. The rest of the
cast is adequate, but again, don’t seem the least bit “Old South.” Having lived in Richmond,
VA, which isn’t even considered the “Deep South,” I found not a whiff of recognition for any
of these characters. And trust me, I’ve
known my fair share of manipulative, two-faced, Southern Belles/Bitches.
Sadly, I think this production is a missed
opportunity. On paper, the cast seems
ideal, but I think the director has molded the performances in a way that doesn’t
jibe with what’s on the page. Oh well,
it seems like Cat… gets revived every couple of years. So I’m sure we’ll be getting the Selena
Gomez-Justin Bieber production in 2015.
Labels:
bad directing,
Broadway,
play,
review,
revival,
starfucking
Tuesday, January 1, 2013
Reviews 2012
- Radio City Christmas Spectacular
- Giant (OB)
- A Christmas Story (Bway)
- Scandalous (Bway)
- The Mystery of Edwin Drood (Bway)
- The Performers (Bway)
- Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (Bway)
- Bring It On: The Musical (Bway)
- Closer Than Ever (OB)
- Chaplin (Bway)
- Forbidden Broadway (OB)
- Red Dog Howls (OB)
- L'Elisir D'Amore (Met)
- Ghost the Musical (Bway)
- Peter and the Starcather (Bway)
- Venus In Fur (Bway)
- Clybourne Park (Bway)
- Other Desert Cities (Bway)
- Dogfight (OB)
- Empire (Spiegeltent)
- Porgy and Bess (Bway)
- Leap of Faith (Bway)
- Carrie (OB)
- Once (Bway)
- Jesus Christ Superstar (Bway)
- Wit (Bway)
- Merrily We Roll Along (Encores!)
- How to Succeed (Bway)
- On A Clear Day (Bway)
2013: A Balloon Odyssey
After gorging ourselves on a seven-course, Tom Colicchio New Year's Eve dinner, Trish and I bade farewell to Val and Juan and made the treacherous voyage home, balloon in hand. Will we - and Trish's balloon - make it home unscathed? Follow our amazing journey below (Just click the arrow).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Jeff Bowen, Lyrics "[Title of Show]"



